[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1511015995.31022.11.camel@perches.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 06:39:55 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Andreas Brauchli <a.brauchli@...mentarea.net>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: allow URL >80 chars
On Sat, 2017-11-18 at 11:07 +0100, Andreas Brauchli wrote:
> Is the patch acceptable if it only catches URL with protocol specifiers
> foo:// ? That would catch most cases and doesn't show false positives:
> $ git grep -E '://\S{75}.*' -- '*.[ch]'
Of course. but I suggest using a prefix like
\b[\w\.\+\-]+://
so the URL scheme is properly described.
It might be best if there was some generic mechanism
to identify possible URIs and not just URLs instead.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Resource_Identifier
Powered by blists - more mailing lists