[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFGhKbw4pHg6oSeo35CBKL1TVp=iA3+kZ-mWBxAop0jY+SiZmg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 20:05:39 +0100
From: Charlemagne Lasse <charlemagnelasse@...il.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...aro.org>,
Jonas Oberg <jonas@...e.org>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
Carmen Bianca Bakker <carmenbianca@...e.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V2 02/11] LICENSES: Add the GPL 2.0 license
2017-11-18 20:03 GMT+01:00 Charlemagne Lasse <charlemagnelasse@...il.com>:
<cut>
>> + Ty Coon, President of Vice
>> +
>> +This General Public License does not permit incorporating your program into
>> +proprietary programs. If your program is a subroutine library, you may
>> +consider it more useful to permit linking proprietary applications with the
>> +library. If this is what you want to do, use the GNU Library General Public
>> +License instead of this License.
>
> "Lesser Library General Public" and not "Library General Public License"
I meant: "Lesser General Public License" and not "Library General
Public License"
Powered by blists - more mailing lists