[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171120092526.llj2q3lqbbxwn4g4@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:25:26 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm,vmscan: Kill global shrinker lock.
On Fri 17-11-17 09:35:21, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 06:37:42AM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > Since do_shrink_slab() can reschedule, we cannot protect shrinker_list
> > using one RCU section. But using atomic_inc()/atomic_dec() for each
> > do_shrink_slab() call will not impact so much.
>
> But you could use SRCU..
Davidlohr has tried that already http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1434398602.1903.15.camel@stgolabs.net
and failed. Doing SRCU inside core kernel is not seen with a great
support...
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists