[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171120142514.GI5165@e110455-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 14:25:14 +0000
From: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
Magnus Damm <damm+renesas@...nsource.se>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
IOMMU ML <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Do not replace bus IOMMU ops on
driver init.
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 04:48:45PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Hi Joerg,
Hi,
>
> On 20/09/17 15:13, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > If the IPMMU driver is compiled in the kernel it will replace the
> > platform bus IOMMU ops on running the ipmmu_init() function, regardless
> > if there is any IPMMU hardware present or not. This screws up systems
> > that just want to build a generic kernel that runs on multiple platforms
> > and use a different IOMMU implementation.
> >
> > Move the bus_set_iommu() call at the end of the ipmmu_probe() function
> > when we know that hardware is present. With current IOMMU framework it
> > should be safe (at least for OF case).
> >
> > Now that the ipmmu_init() and ipmmu_exit() functions are simple calls to
> > platform_driver_register() and platform_driver_unregister(), replace
> > them with the module_platform_driver() macro call.
>
> Are you OK with taking this patch as a fix for 4.14, or would you rather
> have something that can safely backport past 4.12 without implicit
> dependencies? This is a config/link-order dependent thing that's been
> lurking since the beginning, but only coming to light now that other
> drivers are changing their behaviour, so I don't think there's really a
> single Fixes: commit that can be singled out.
Can someone update me on the fate of this patch? Can someone queue it
for the next release?
Best regards,
Liviu
>
> Robin.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>
> > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c | 29 +++++------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c b/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
> > index 195d6e93ac718..31912997bffdf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
> > @@ -966,10 +966,11 @@ static int ipmmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > return ret;
> >
> > /*
> > - * We can't create the ARM mapping here as it requires the bus to have
> > - * an IOMMU, which only happens when bus_set_iommu() is called in
> > - * ipmmu_init() after the probe function returns.
> > + * Now that we have validated the presence of the hardware, set
> > + * the bus IOMMU ops to enable future domain and device setup.
> > */
> > + if (!iommu_present(&platform_bus_type))
> > + bus_set_iommu(&platform_bus_type, &ipmmu_ops);
> >
> > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mmu);
> >
> > @@ -1006,27 +1007,7 @@ static struct platform_driver ipmmu_driver = {
> > .remove = ipmmu_remove,
> > };
> >
> > -static int __init ipmmu_init(void)
> > -{
> > - int ret;
> > -
> > - ret = platform_driver_register(&ipmmu_driver);
> > - if (ret < 0)
> > - return ret;
> > -
> > - if (!iommu_present(&platform_bus_type))
> > - bus_set_iommu(&platform_bus_type, &ipmmu_ops);
> > -
> > - return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static void __exit ipmmu_exit(void)
> > -{
> > - return platform_driver_unregister(&ipmmu_driver);
> > -}
> > -
> > -subsys_initcall(ipmmu_init);
> > -module_exit(ipmmu_exit);
> > +module_platform_driver(ipmmu_driver);
> >
> > MODULE_DESCRIPTION("IOMMU API for Renesas VMSA-compatible IPMMU");
> > MODULE_AUTHOR("Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>");
> >
>
--
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world, |
| but they're not |
| giving me the |
\ source code! /
---------------
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Powered by blists - more mailing lists