[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrXyJw55+NE8se8ed=KSntF9nwrxst-kzLm3Xzs314QVzg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:48:49 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@...e.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] Entry stuff, in decent shape now
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
> This sets up stack switching, including for SYSCALL. I think it's
> in decent shape.
>
> - 32-bit kernels are failing the sigreturn_32 test. But they're also
> failing without the patches, so I'm not sure this is a bug in the
> series per se. Needs further investigation. (Off the top of my head,
> this could be further fallout from Thomas's IDT rework.)
Hmm, I lied. They *were* failing, but it was fixed by:
commit d0cd64b02aa854d68ce517cb7da1fe4e4fff2653
Author: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Date: Wed Nov 8 11:28:45 2017 -0800
x86/idt: Remove X86_TRAP_BP initialization in idt_setup_traps()
so never mind.
I'd love to get the x86 selftests added to 0day's pile.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists