[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171120210400.GE89108@samitolvanen.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 13:04:00 -0800
From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Alex Matveev <alxmtvv@...il.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim.kuvyrkov@...aro.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/18] Add support for clang LTO
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 03:21:40PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Would it be possible to split this into:
>
> (1) (basic) arm64 clang support
> (2) gold support (no LTO)
> (3) LTO support
>
> ... with any necessary workarounds added as-required to the relevant
> series?
Absolutely. I'll split the patches into more sensible sets.
Sami
Powered by blists - more mailing lists