linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 00/11] Intel SGX Driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171120222028.tugaad4bsj7vbm7i@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:20:28 +0200
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     intel-sgx-kernel-dev@...ts.01.org,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/11] Intel SGX Driver

On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 11:35:42AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> 
> Any reason why you did not CC the x86 maintainers and other x86 developers
> who have had opinions on the first attempt to get SGX into the kernel?
> 
> This is not some driver for a random peripheral. This has substantional
> effects. I'm assuming you simply forgot or were not aware, but this is not
> the way this works.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	tglx

I'll CC v6 to x86 maintainers. I'm sorry about this.

/Jarkko