[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+r1Zhj295pmVTmh_TVMuy37qRQ7Q6Mxipk7vhyAVkuXFBU8uw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 17:00:48 -0700
From: Jim Davis <jim.epost@...il.com>
To: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>
Cc: Knut Omang <knut.omang@...cle.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] kbuild: Add P= command line flag to run checkpatch
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Luc Van Oostenryck
<luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com> wrote:
> Should it be possible to somehow keep the distinction between
> the flags coming from KBUILD_CFLAGS and the pure CHECKFLAGS?
Well, the practical problem seems to be that $(CHECK) is called in
scripts/Makefile.build with both $(CHECKFLAGS) and $(c_flags) as
arguments, regardless of what $(CHECK) is. That can be hacked around
with something inelegant like
diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.build b/scripts/Makefile.build
index bb831d49bcfd..102194f9afb9 100644
--- a/scripts/Makefile.build
+++ b/scripts/Makefile.build
@@ -98,14 +98,20 @@ __build: $(if $(KBUILD_BUILTIN),$(builtin-target)
$(lib-target) $(extra-y)) \
$(subdir-ym) $(always)
@:
-# Linus' kernel sanity checking tool
+# Linus' kernel sanity checking tool, or $CHECK program of choice
+ifneq ($(KBUILD_CHECKSRC),)
+ add_to_checkflags =
+ ifeq ($(CHECK),sparse)
+ add_to_checkflags = $(c_flags)
+ endif
+endif
ifneq ($(KBUILD_CHECKSRC),0)
ifeq ($(KBUILD_CHECKSRC),2)
quiet_cmd_force_checksrc = CHECK $<
- cmd_force_checksrc = $(CHECK) $(CHECKFLAGS) $(c_flags) $< ;
+ cmd_force_checksrc = $(CHECK) $(CHECKFLAGS) $(add_to_checkflags) $< ;
else
quiet_cmd_checksrc = CHECK $<
- cmd_checksrc = $(CHECK) $(CHECKFLAGS) $(c_flags) $< ;
+ cmd_checksrc = $(CHECK) $(CHECKFLAGS) $(add_to_checkflags) $< ;
endif
endif
and then if I run scripts/checkpatch.pl as $CHECK and pass --quiet
--file as before it works -- until checkpatch returns with a non-zero
exit code, which causes the Makefile to bail at that point.
So maybe a wrapper script, with an exit 0 fixup to keep on keeping on
in case of checkpatch warnings or errors, would be better after all.
--
Jim
Powered by blists - more mailing lists