linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.13 00/28] 4.13.15-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ab1bb26f-b4ae-8dfa-bafe-810583144fdc@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Tue, 21 Nov 2017 02:06:25 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuahkh@....samsung.com,
        patches@...nelci.org, ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.13 00/28] 4.13.15-stable review

On 11/20/2017 11:51 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 08:23:20AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 06:13:42AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> On 11/19/2017 06:43 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.13.15 release.
>>>> There are 28 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>>> let me know.
>>>>
>>>> Responses should be made by Tue Nov 21 14:42:57 UTC 2017.
>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Build results:
>>> 	total: 145 pass: 143 fail: 2
>>> Failed builds:
>>> 	arm:allmodconfig
>>> 	arm64:allmodconfig
>>> Qemu test results:
>>> 	total: 123 pass: 107 fail: 16
>>> Failed tests:
>>> 	arm:beagle:multi_v7_defconfig:omap3-beagle
>>> 	arm:beaglexm:multi_v7_defconfig:omap3-beagle-xm
>>> 	arm:overo:multi_v7_defconfig:omap3-overo-tobi
>>> 	arm:sabrelite:multi_v7_defconfig:imx6dl-sabrelite
>>> 	arm:vexpress-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca9
>>> 	arm:vexpress-a15:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1
>>> 	arm:vexpress-a15-a7:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7
>>> 	arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:zynq-zc702
>>> 	arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:zynq-zc706
>>> 	arm:xilinx-zynq-a9:multi_v7_defconfig:zynq-zed
>>> 	arm:midway:multi_v7_defconfig:ecx-2000
>>> 	arm:smdkc210:multi_v7_defconfig:exynos4210-smdkv310
>>> 	arm64:virt:smp:defconfig
>>> 	arm64:xlnx-ep108:smp:defconfig:zynqmp-ep108
>>> 	arm64:virt:nosmp:defconfig
>>> 	arm64:xlnx-ep108:nosmp:defconfig:zynqmp-ep108
>>>
>>> Error ias always the same.
>>>
>>> Building arm:allmodconfig ... failed
>>> --------------
>>> Error log:
>>> /opt/buildbot/slave/stable-queue-4.13/build/drivers/crypto/bcm/cipher.c: In function 'mailbox_send_message':
>>> /opt/buildbot/slave/stable-queue-4.13/build/drivers/crypto/bcm/cipher.c:266:40: error: request for member 'dev' in something not a structure or union
>>>    struct device *dev = &(iproc_priv.pdev->dev);
>>
>> Ugh, I missed this yesterday, I'll go try to figure out how I broke
>> this, and how my test builds missed this...
> 
> Ok, I think I've found it, and now dropped the offending patch.
> 

With v4.13.14-28-g92df2ce:

Build results:
	total: 145 pass: 145 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
	total: 123 pass: 123 fail: 0

Guenter