[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171121105325.GA17299@sejong>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 19:53:25 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mhiramat@...nel.org,
vedang.patel@...el.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
joel.opensrc@...il.com, joelaf@...gle.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, baohong.liu@...el.com,
rajvi.jingar@...el.com, julia@...com, fengguang.wu@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 22/37] tracing: Add variable reference handling to
hist triggers
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 02:33:01PM -0600, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> Add the necessary infrastructure to allow the variables defined on one
> event to be referenced in another. This allows variables set by a
> previous event to be referenced and used in expressions combining the
> variable values saved by that previous event and the event fields of
> the current event. For example, here's how a latency can be
> calculated and saved into yet another variable named 'wakeup_lat':
>
> # echo 'hist:keys=pid,prio:ts0=$common_timestamp ...
> # echo 'hist:keys=next_pid:wakeup_lat=$common_timestamp-$ts0 ...
>
> In the first event, the event's timetamp is saved into the variable
> ts0. In the next line, ts0 is subtracted from the second event's
> timestamp to produce the latency.
>
> Further users of variable references will be described in subsequent
> patches, such as for instance how the 'wakeup_lat' variable above can
> be displayed in a latency histogram.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
[SNIP]
> @@ -914,13 +1383,38 @@ struct hist_field *parse_atom(struct hist_trigger_data *hist_data,
> struct trace_event_file *file, char *str,
> unsigned long *flags, char *var_name)
> {
> - char *s;
> + char *s, *ref_system = NULL, *ref_event = NULL, *ref_var = str;
> struct ftrace_event_field *field = NULL;
> struct hist_field *hist_field = NULL;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - s = local_field_var_ref(hist_data, str);
> - if (s)
> + s = strchr(str, '.');
> + if (s) {
> + s = strchr(++s, '.');
> + if (s) {
> + ref_system = strsep(&str, ".");
> + if (!str) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + ref_event = strsep(&str, ".");
> + if (!str) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + ref_var = str;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + s = local_field_var_ref(hist_data, ref_var);
Wouldn't it be called when ref_system + ref_event are NULL or same as
hist_data->file's ?
Thanks,
Namhyung
> + if (!s) {
> + hist_field = parse_var_ref(hist_data, ref_system, ref_event, ref_var);
> + if (hist_field) {
> + hist_data->var_refs[hist_data->n_var_refs] = hist_field;
> + hist_field->var_ref_idx = hist_data->n_var_refs++;
> + return hist_field;
> + }
> + } else
> str = s;
>
> field = parse_field(hist_data, file, str, flags);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists