lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 21 Nov 2017 22:40:12 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To:     LiFan <fanofcode.li@...sung.com>, 'Chao Yu' <yuchao0@...wei.com>,
        'Jaegeuk Kim' <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH RESEND v2] f2fs: fix concurrent problem for
 updating free bitmap

On 2017/11/21 16:19, LiFan wrote:
> alloc_nid_failed and scan_nat_page can be called at the same time,
> and we haven't protected add_free_nid and update_free_nid_bitmap
> with the same nid_list_lock. That could lead to
> 
> Thread A				Thread B
> - __build_free_nids
>  - scan_nat_page				
>   - add_free_nid
> 					- alloc_nid_failed
> 					 - update_free_nid_bitmap
>   - update_free_nid_bitmap
> 
> scan_nat_page will clear the free bitmap since the nid is PREALLOC_NID,
> but alloc_nid_failed needs to set the free bitmap. This results in
> free nid with free bitmap cleared.
> This patch update the bitmap under the same nid_list_lock in add_free_nid.
> And use __GFP_NOFAIL to make sure to update status of free nid correctly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fan li <fanofcode.li@...sung.com>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/node.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
>  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> index b965a53..dd299c5 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -1811,8 +1811,33 @@ static void __move_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct free_nid *i,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static void update_free_nid_bitmap(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid,
> +							bool set, bool build)
> +{
> +	struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
> +	unsigned int nat_ofs = NAT_BLOCK_OFFSET(nid);
> +	unsigned int nid_ofs = nid - START_NID(nid);
> +
> +	if (!test_bit_le(nat_ofs, nm_i->nat_block_bitmap))
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (set) {
> +		if (test_bit_le(nid_ofs, nm_i->free_nid_bitmap[nat_ofs]))
> +			return;
> +		__set_bit_le(nid_ofs, nm_i->free_nid_bitmap[nat_ofs]);
> +		nm_i->free_nid_count[nat_ofs]++;
> +	} else {
> +		if (!test_bit_le(nid_ofs, nm_i->free_nid_bitmap[nat_ofs]))
> +			return;
> +		__clear_bit_le(nid_ofs, nm_i->free_nid_bitmap[nat_ofs]);
> +		if (!build)
> +			nm_i->free_nid_count[nat_ofs]--;
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  /* return if the nid is recognized as free */
> -static bool add_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid, bool build)
> +static bool add_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> +				nid_t nid, bool build, bool update)
>  {
>  	struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
>  	struct free_nid *i, *e;
> @@ -1828,7 +1853,7 @@ static bool add_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid, bool build)
>  	i->nid = nid;
>  	i->state = FREE_NID;
>  
> -	if (radix_tree_preload(GFP_NOFS))
> +	if (radix_tree_preload(GFP_NOFS | __GFP_NOFAIL))
>  		goto err;

We will never fail if we call radix_tree_preload with __GFP_NOFAIL, so
we don't need to check return value here.

BTW, I can not apply this patch, could you rebase this patch on last
dev-test branch?

Thanks,

>  
>  	spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
> @@ -1870,6 +1895,11 @@ static bool add_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid, bool build)
>  	ret = true;
>  	err = __insert_free_nid(sbi, i, FREE_NID);
>  err_out:
> +	if (update) {
> +		update_free_nid_bitmap(sbi, nid, ret, build);
> +		if (!build)
> +			nm_i->available_nids++;
> +	}
>  	spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
>  	radix_tree_preload_end();
>  err:
> @@ -1896,30 +1926,6 @@ static void remove_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
>  		kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
>  }
>  
> -static void update_free_nid_bitmap(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid,
> -							bool set, bool build)
> -{
> -	struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
> -	unsigned int nat_ofs = NAT_BLOCK_OFFSET(nid);
> -	unsigned int nid_ofs = nid - START_NID(nid);
> -
> -	if (!test_bit_le(nat_ofs, nm_i->nat_block_bitmap))
> -		return;
> -
> -	if (set) {
> -		if (test_bit_le(nid_ofs, nm_i->free_nid_bitmap[nat_ofs]))
> -			return;
> -		__set_bit_le(nid_ofs, nm_i->free_nid_bitmap[nat_ofs]);
> -		nm_i->free_nid_count[nat_ofs]++;
> -	} else {
> -		if (!test_bit_le(nid_ofs, nm_i->free_nid_bitmap[nat_ofs]))
> -			return;
> -		__clear_bit_le(nid_ofs, nm_i->free_nid_bitmap[nat_ofs]);
> -		if (!build)
> -			nm_i->free_nid_count[nat_ofs]--;
> -	}
> -}
> -
>  static void scan_nat_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  			struct page *nat_page, nid_t start_nid)
>  {
> @@ -1937,18 +1943,18 @@ static void scan_nat_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  	i = start_nid % NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK;
>  
>  	for (; i < NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK; i++, start_nid++) {
> -		bool freed = false;
> -
>  		if (unlikely(start_nid >= nm_i->max_nid))
>  			break;
>  
>  		blk_addr = le32_to_cpu(nat_blk->entries[i].block_addr);
>  		f2fs_bug_on(sbi, blk_addr == NEW_ADDR);
> -		if (blk_addr == NULL_ADDR)
> -			freed = add_free_nid(sbi, start_nid, true);
> -		spin_lock(&NM_I(sbi)->nid_list_lock);
> -		update_free_nid_bitmap(sbi, start_nid, freed, true);
> -		spin_unlock(&NM_I(sbi)->nid_list_lock);
> +		if (blk_addr == NULL_ADDR) {
> +			add_free_nid(sbi, start_nid, true, true);
> +		} else {
> +			spin_lock(&NM_I(sbi)->nid_list_lock);
> +			update_free_nid_bitmap(sbi, start_nid, false, true);
> +			spin_unlock(&NM_I(sbi)->nid_list_lock);
> +		}
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -1974,7 +1980,7 @@ static void scan_free_nid_bits(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>  				break;
>  
>  			nid = i * NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK + idx;
> -			add_free_nid(sbi, nid, true);
> +			add_free_nid(sbi, nid, true, false);
>  
>  			if (nm_i->nid_cnt[FREE_NID] >= MAX_FREE_NIDS)
>  				goto out;
> @@ -1988,7 +1994,7 @@ static void scan_free_nid_bits(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>  		addr = le32_to_cpu(nat_in_journal(journal, i).block_addr);
>  		nid = le32_to_cpu(nid_in_journal(journal, i));
>  		if (addr == NULL_ADDR)
> -			add_free_nid(sbi, nid, true);
> +			add_free_nid(sbi, nid, true, false);
>  		else
>  			remove_free_nid(sbi, nid);
>  	}
> @@ -2053,7 +2059,7 @@ static void __build_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool sync, bool mount)
>  		addr = le32_to_cpu(nat_in_journal(journal, i).block_addr);
>  		nid = le32_to_cpu(nid_in_journal(journal, i));
>  		if (addr == NULL_ADDR)
> -			add_free_nid(sbi, nid, true);
> +			add_free_nid(sbi, nid, true, false);
>  		else
>  			remove_free_nid(sbi, nid);
>  	}
> @@ -2499,11 +2505,7 @@ static void __flush_nat_entry_set(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  		nat_reset_flag(ne);
>  		__clear_nat_cache_dirty(NM_I(sbi), set, ne);
>  		if (nat_get_blkaddr(ne) == NULL_ADDR) {
> -			add_free_nid(sbi, nid, false);
> -			spin_lock(&NM_I(sbi)->nid_list_lock);
> -			NM_I(sbi)->available_nids++;
> -			update_free_nid_bitmap(sbi, nid, true, false);
> -			spin_unlock(&NM_I(sbi)->nid_list_lock);
> +			add_free_nid(sbi, nid, false, true);
>  		} else {
>  			spin_lock(&NM_I(sbi)->nid_list_lock);
>  			update_free_nid_bitmap(sbi, nid, false, false);
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ