linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/16] Entry stuff, in decent shape now

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALCETrWkEPvp6_4v4KgeKw7G4rP+MmMVg+tDrg3w+c0R1bDBMw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Nov 2017 08:12:40 -0800
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@...e.de>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] Entry stuff, in decent shape now

On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 7:59 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> * Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>>> This sets up stack switching, including for SYSCALL.  I think it's
>>> in decent shape.
>>>
>>> Known issues:
>>>  - KASAN is likely to be busted.  This could be fixed either by teaching
>>>    KASAN that cpu_entry_area contains valid stacks (I have no clue how
>>>    to go about doing this) or by rigging up the IST entry code to switch
>>>    RSP to point to the direct-mapped copy of the stacks before calling
>>>    into non-KASAN-excluded C code.
>>>
>>>  - 32-bit kernels are failing the sigreturn_32 test.  But they're also
>>>    failing without the patches, so I'm not sure this is a bug in the
>>>    series per se.  Needs further investigation.  (Off the top of my head,
>>>    this could be further fallout from Thomas's IDT rework.)
>>>
>>>  - I think we're going to want a way to turn the stack switching on and
>>>    off either at boot time or at runtime.  It should be fairly straightforward
>>>    to make it work.
>>>
>>>  - I think the ORC unwinder isn't so good at dealing with stack overflows.
>>>    It bails too early (I think), resulting in lots of ? entries.  This
>>>    isn't a regression with this series -- it's just something that could
>>>    be improved.
>>
>> Another problem I just found: IRQ tracing appears busted on 64-bit kernels - with
>> lockdep enabled I get this boot warning:
>>
>>  [    4.309026] WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 222 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3924 check_flags.part.45+0x1a5/0x1b0
>>  ...
>>  [    4.309026] possible reason: unannotated irqs-off.
>>
>> That's on a x86-64 defconfig-ish kernel with CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y, running on an
>> AMD system. Full splat below.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>         Ingo
>>
>> [    4.272197] LVT offset 0 assigned for vector 0x400
>> [    4.278486] perf: AMD IBS detected (0x000000ff)
>> [    4.284786] kvm: Nested Virtualization enabled
>> [    4.289447] kvm: Nested Paging enabled
>> [    4.308496] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(current->hardirqs_enabled)
>> [    4.308512] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> [    4.309026] WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 222 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3924 check_flags.part.45+0x1a5/0x1b0
>> [    4.309026] Modules linked in:
>> [    4.309026] CPU: 10 PID: 222 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 4.14.0-01345-g9490674-dirty #1
>> [    4.309026] Hardware name: Supermicro H8DG6/H8DGi/H8DG6/H8DGi, BIOS 2.0b       03/01/2012
>> [    4.309026] task: ffff880814b08000 task.stack: ffffc90007dcc000
>> [    4.309026] RIP: 0010:check_flags.part.45+0x1a5/0x1b0
>> [    4.309026] RSP: 0018:ffffc90007dcfeb0 EFLAGS: 00010082
>> [    4.309026] RAX: 000000000000002e RBX: ffff880814b08000 RCX: 0000000000000000
>> [    4.309026] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffff81152e76
>> [    4.309026] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
>> [    4.309026] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
>> [    4.309026] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000000
>> [    4.309026] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff880817c80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>> [    4.309026] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>> [    4.309026] CR2: 00007f8badc39218 CR3: 000000081584b000 CR4: 00000000000406e0
>> [    4.309026] Call Trace:
>> [    4.309026]  lock_acquire+0x11a/0x1d0
>> [    4.309026]  vtime_user_exit+0x3c/0xa0
>> [    4.309026]  ? __context_tracking_exit.part.4+0x45/0x130
>> [    4.309026]  __context_tracking_exit.part.4+0x45/0x130
>> [    4.309026]  do_syscall_64+0x13f/0x220
>> [    4.309026]  entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25
>
> I'm not reproducing this.  On quick inspection, the only potential
> issue I see is that native_gs_load_index is missing IRQ tracing
> annotations, but I don't see why this series would have any particular
> effect on that.

Never mind, I reproduced it.

>
> Do you see it on my latest tree?
>
> --Andy