linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] usercopy whitelisting for v4.15-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2bdb9891-a8e9-634b-ec9e-bf7f6167e069@infradead.org>
Date:   Tue, 21 Nov 2017 09:22:00 -0800
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        David Windsor <dave@...gbits.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] usercopy whitelisting for v4.15-rc1

On 11/21/2017 05:53 AM, Lukas Wunner wrote:

> There is a growing sense that hardening patches (which are generally
> desirable of course) are forced into the kernel without due diligence.
> Objections against tone notwithstanding, making that concern known in
> a form with greater visibility than an LWN comment was appropriate by
> Linus.

More (qualified) reviewers should also help in patch acceptance.
I expect that's a problem, both in qualifications and time to review.

-- 
~Randy