[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b7b3cf4b-837e-f9ba-61c0-4f9ddd8b9a95@kernel.dk>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 10:27:04 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: 4.14: WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 2895 at block/blk-mq.c:1144 with
virtio-blk (also 4.12 stable)
On 11/21/2017 03:14 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Bisect points to
>
> 1b5a7455d345b223d3a4658a9e5fce985b7998c1 is the first bad commit
> commit 1b5a7455d345b223d3a4658a9e5fce985b7998c1
> Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> Date: Mon Jun 26 12:20:57 2017 +0200
>
> blk-mq: Create hctx for each present CPU
>
> commit 4b855ad37194f7bdbb200ce7a1c7051fecb56a08 upstream.
>
> Currently we only create hctx for online CPUs, which can lead to a lot
> of churn due to frequent soft offline / online operations. Instead
> allocate one for each present CPU to avoid this and dramatically simplify
> the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
> Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
> Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170626102058.10200-3-hch@lst.de
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>
> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
I wonder if we're simply not getting the masks updated correctly. I'll
take a look.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists