[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171121193845.GA9680@roeck-us.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 11:38:45 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuahkh@....samsung.com,
patches@...nelci.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 00/31] 4.14.1-stable review
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 07:07:14PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 18:09 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 04:46:18PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 17:35 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 03:26:10PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > > > > Not all 32-bit configurations can provide cmpxchg64(). i40e's use of
> > > > > cmpxchg64() appears to be fixed by:
> > > > >
> > > > > b74f571f59a8 i40e/i40evf: organize and re-number feature flags
> > > > > b48be9978e4b i40e: fix flags declaration
> > > >
> > > > So without those patches, are any specific arches/configs broken for
> > > > 4.14?
> > >
> > > 32-bit parisc is.
> >
> > Ok, but that's a horrid hack on the i40e driver, it just happens to move
> > the bitfield to a 32bit variable. Can't we just provide a "real"
> > cmpxchg64() for 32-bit parisc?
>
> No. There is a generic implementation of cmpxchg64() but it is only
> suitable for non-SMP configurations.
>
Dave implemented the following for sparc32 (in arch/sparc/lib/atomic32.c).
u64 __cmpxchg_u64(u64 *ptr, u64 old, u64 new)
{
unsigned long flags;
u64 prev;
spin_lock_irqsave(ATOMIC_HASH(ptr), flags);
if ((prev = *ptr) == old)
*ptr = new;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(ATOMIC_HASH(ptr), flags);
return prev;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cmpxchg_u64);
Maybe something like this would work for other 32 bit architectures as well ?
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists