lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171121223105.Horde.0wPMwrFfFWPy1LGFb0K7hjn@www.imp.polymtl.ca>
Date:   Tue, 21 Nov 2017 22:31:05 +0000
From:   Abderrahmane Benbachir <abderrahmane.benbachir@...ymtl.ca>
To:     pasha.tatashin@...cle.com
Cc:     peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Very Early boot time stamps support


Hi Pavel,
I'm implementing a feature in ftrace to enable very early function  
tracing, I'm using tsc when x86_tsc feature is available, but it seems  
that you did similar work in your patch "[PATCH v9 0/6] Early boot  
time stamps for x86".

I need to record timestamps at the start of start_kernel(), the first  
function to be traced is set_task_stack_end_magic.

How early does the patch provide stable tsc ?

This is the patch that need to use very early time stamps :  
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/8/1031

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ