linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] mm: introduce get_user_pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20171121150501.d4d811a66444cb5c9cb85bf2@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 21 Nov 2017 15:05:01 -0800
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] mm: introduce get_user_pages_longterm

On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 11:56:34 -0800 Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:

> Until there is a solution to the dma-to-dax vs truncate problem it is
> not safe to allow long standing memory registrations against
> filesytem-dax vmas. Device-dax vmas do not have this problem and are
> explicitly allowed.
> 
> This is temporary until a "memory registration with layout-lease"
> mechanism can be implemented for the affected sub-systems (RDMA and
> V4L2).

Sounds like that will be unpleasant.  Do we really need it to be that
complex?  Can we get away with simply failing the get_user_pages()
request?  Or are there significant usecases for RDMA and V4L to play
with DAX memory?