linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/18] arm64: Unmap the kernel whilst running in userspace (KAISER)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 22 Nov 2017 23:33:55 +0100
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc:     Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] arm64: Unmap the kernel whilst running in
 userspace (KAISER)

On Wed 2017-11-22 21:19:28, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 22 November 2017 at 16:19, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> >> This patch series implements something along the lines of KAISER for arm64:
> >>
> >>   https://gruss.cc/files/kaiser.pdf
> >>
> >> although I wrote this from scratch because the paper has some funny
> >> assumptions about how the architecture works. There is a patch series
> >> in review for x86, which follows a similar approach:
> >>
> >>   http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<20171110193058.BECA7D88@...go.jf.intel.com>
> >>
> >> and the topic was recently covered by LWN (currently subscriber-only):
> >>
> >>   https://lwn.net/Articles/738975/
> >>
> >> The basic idea is that transitions to and from userspace are proxied
> >> through a trampoline page which is mapped into a separate page table and
> >> can switch the full kernel mapping in and out on exception entry and
> >> exit respectively. This is a valuable defence against various KASLR and
> >> timing attacks, particularly as the trampoline page is at a fixed virtual
> >> address and therefore the kernel text can be randomized
> >> independently.
> >
> > If I'm willing to do timing attacks to defeat KASLR... what prevents
> > me from using CPU caches to do that?
> >
> 
> Because it is impossible to get a cache hit on an access to an
> unmapped address?

Um, no, I don't need to be able to directly access kernel addresses. I
just put some data in _same place in cache where kernel data would
go_, then do syscall and look if my data are still cached. Caches
don't have infinite associativity.

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)