[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ff787c19-7429-b6a8-5379-6568c06fdc81@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 13:38:53 +0800
From: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
kan.liang@...el.com, yao.jin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 8/9] perf stat: Remove --per-thread pid/tid limitation
On 11/21/2017 11:18 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:43:43PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
>> Currently, if we execute 'perf stat --per-thread' without specifying
>> pid/tid, perf will return error.
>>
>> root@skl:/tmp# perf stat --per-thread
>> The --per-thread option is only available when monitoring via -p -t options.
>> -p, --pid <pid> stat events on existing process id
>> -t, --tid <tid> stat events on existing thread id
>>
>> This patch removes this limitation. If no pid/tid specified, it returns
>> all threads (get threads from /proc).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> tools/perf/builtin-stat.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
>> tools/perf/util/target.h | 7 +++++++
>> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
>> index 9eec145..2d718f7 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c
>> @@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static int create_perf_stat_counter(struct perf_evsel *evsel)
>> attr->enable_on_exec = 1;
>> }
>>
>> - if (target__has_cpu(&target))
>> + if (target__has_cpu(&target) && !target__has_per_thread(&target))
>
> please add comment on why this is needed..
>
>> return perf_evsel__open_per_cpu(evsel, perf_evsel__cpus(evsel));
>>
>> return perf_evsel__open_per_thread(evsel, evsel_list->threads);
>> @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ static int read_counter(struct perf_evsel *counter)
>> int nthreads = thread_map__nr(evsel_list->threads);
>> int ncpus, cpu, thread;
>>
>> - if (target__has_cpu(&target))
>> + if (target__has_cpu(&target) && !target__has_per_thread(&target))
>
> same here
>
That's because this patch series doesn't support cpu_list yet. So if
it's a cpu_list case, then skip.
I plan to add cpu_list supporting as follow-up patch to avoid adding too
much in this patch series.
Thanks
Jin Yao
> thanks,
> jirka
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists