lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 00:08:45 -0600 From: Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org> To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 30/30] PCI: remove pci_get_bus_and_slot() function On 11/21/17 11:55 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote: > For places where domain number information is available, I extracted domain number > and added into pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() call such as xen or bn drivers. My suggestion is that you restrict your first patch set to only these patches. > The assumption at this point is for pci_get_bus_and_slot() usages to be caught > in code-review. How about this: static inline struct pci_dev * __deprecated pci_get_bus_and_slot(unsigned int bus, unsigned int devfn) { return pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(0, bus, devfn); } -- Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists