lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:40:13 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <>
To:     Sudeep Holla <>
Cc:     Eduardo Valentin <>,
        Javi Merino <>,
        Vincent Guittot <>,
        Lukasz Luba <>,
        Daniel Lezcano <>,
        Ionela Voinescu <>,
        Punit Agrawal <>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <>,
        Amit Daniel Kachhap <>,
        Zhang Rui <>,
        Steven Rostedt <>,
        Ingo Molnar <>,
        Linux PM <>,
        Lukasz Luba <>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] cpu_cooling: Drop static-power related stuff

On 22-11-17, 10:59, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> IMO, if the $subject code is expected to be used on Juno, then my answer
> is no if one can't test it reliably and also prove that static power
> really matters on Juno. So far, I have heard both the above is not
> possible. So please delete the code if Juno is the only user in
> short and mid term. We can get the code back if we find any users in
> longer term.

Its funny that the $subject patch receives few Acks and Nacks every day now :)


Powered by blists - more mailing lists