[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171122111013.GB4084@vireshk-i7>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:40:13 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Javi Merino <javi.merino@...nel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Lukasz Luba <llu.ker.dev@...il.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>,
Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@...il.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] cpu_cooling: Drop static-power related stuff
On 22-11-17, 10:59, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> IMO, if the $subject code is expected to be used on Juno, then my answer
> is no if one can't test it reliably and also prove that static power
> really matters on Juno. So far, I have heard both the above is not
> possible. So please delete the code if Juno is the only user in
> short and mid term. We can get the code back if we find any users in
> longer term.
Its funny that the $subject patch receives few Acks and Nacks every day now :)
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists