[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171122123821.GA697@jagdpanzerIV>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 21:38:21 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: kernel CI: printk loglevels in kernel boot logs?
On (11/22/17 12:34), Petr Mladek wrote:
[..]
> > > > This is espeically useful when ingesting kernel logs into advanced
> > > > search/analytics frameworks (I'm playing with and ELK stack: Elastic
> > > > Search, Logstash, Kibana).
[..]
> To make it clear. I understand that "show_loglevel" command line argument
> would be useful for you. But I am afraid that it is not worth changing
> the format. There would need to be wide interest into the change.
> Also there would need to be evidence that the existing solutions
> (dmesg --raw, console_loglevel) are not enough in many real life
> scenarios.
well, I think that that "consoles_format=syslog" command line parameter
will be enabled only by those who actually want to have it - Fengguang's
build robot and kernelCI (+ may be more setups). so I'd probably assume
there are low risks here. may be I'm wrong.
I think it makes sense to have syslog's format "<%u>[timestamp] text\n"
on serial consoles (time stamp when PRINTK_TIME set; <%u> when
consoles_format=syslog set).
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists