linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 29/30] i7300_idle: deprecate pci_get_bus_and

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 22 Nov 2017 17:45:46 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, timur@...eaurora.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 29/30] i7300_idle: deprecate pci_get_bus_and_slot()

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 11:15:47AM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 11/22/2017 2:53 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >> +++ b/include/linux/i7300_idle.h
> >> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static inline int i7300_idle_platform_probe(struct pci_dev **fbd_dev,
> >>  	int i;
> >>  	struct pci_dev *memdev, *dmadev;
> >>  
> >> -	memdev = pci_get_bus_and_slot(MEMCTL_BUS, MEMCTL_DEVFN);
> >> +	memdev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(0, MEMCTL_BUS, MEMCTL_DEVFN);
> > You have a pci_dev, why can't you use it here to get the domain?
> > 
> 
> Both fbd_dev and ioat_dev are output parameters. 
> 
> dmadev = pci_get_bus_and_slot(IOAT_BUS, IOAT_DEVFN);
> memdev = pci_get_bus_and_slot(MEMCTL_BUS, MEMCTL_DEVFN);
> 
> 	for (i = 0; fbd_ioat_list[i].vendor != 0; i++) {
> 		if (dmadev->vendor == fbd_ioat_list[i].vendor &&
> 		    dmadev->device == fbd_ioat_list[i].ioat_dev) {
> 			if (!(fbd_ioat_list[i].enabled || enable_all))
> 				continue;
> 
> 			if (fbd_dev)
> 				*fbd_dev = memdev;
> 			if (ioat_dev)
> 				*ioat_dev = dmadev;
> 
> Funny thing is nobody is calling this function. Maybe, I should just kill it
> instead.

Yes, delete it.  Why doesn't the build warn about it not being used?

thanks,

greg k-h