[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e4d0ef8d-bddf-0514-1f3e-7b56806cfe49@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 17:56:26 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Liran Alon <LIRAN.ALON@...CLE.COM>,
Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Fix vmx->nested freeing when no SMI handler
On 22/11/2017 10:43, Liran Alon wrote:
>>>
>>> I think we should also set "vmx->nested.smm.vmxon = false;"
>>> after "vmx->nested.vmxon = false;" to correctlyhandle the case
>>> VMXOFF is executed from SMI handler. Otherwise, when SMI handler
>>> executes RSM, we will reach vmx_pre_leave_smm() which will set
>>> again "vmx->nested.vmxon = true;" which I think shouldn't
>>> happen.
>>
>> I didn't see a real scenario for this.
>
> Actually I later saw that handle_vmoff() calls
> nested_vmx_check_permission() which indeed won't allow to continue
> executing if running from SMI because vmx->nested.vmxon=false; and
> therefore this will raise a #UD. So you are right. :)
Still, not clearing the flag is wrong. free_nested is also called by
vmx_leave_nested when the host writes 0 to MSR_IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL with
KVM_SET_MSRS.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists