[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171122205645.GA27125@beast>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 12:56:45 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] genirq: Make - vs ?: precedence explicit
Noticed with a Clang build. This improves the readability of the ?:
expression, as it has lower precedence than the - expression. Show
explicitly that - is evaluated first.
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
---
kernel/irq/matrix.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/matrix.c b/kernel/irq/matrix.c
index a3cbbc8191c5..7df2480005f8 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/matrix.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/matrix.c
@@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ unsigned int irq_matrix_available(struct irq_matrix *m, bool cpudown)
{
struct cpumap *cm = this_cpu_ptr(m->maps);
- return m->global_available - cpudown ? cm->available : 0;
+ return (m->global_available - cpudown) ? cm->available : 0;
}
/**
--
2.7.4
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Powered by blists - more mailing lists