| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <9b911930-ca95-b325-e032-918b21984727@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 09:12:09 +0530
From: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] selftest/vm: Add test case for mmap across 128TB
boundary.
On 11/23/2017 08:33 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
>
> This patch add a self-test that covers a few corner cases of the interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> Changes from V1:
> * Add the test to run_vmtests script
>
> tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests | 11 ++
> tools/testing/selftests/vm/va_128TBswitch.c | 297 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 309 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/vm/va_128TBswitch.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile
> index cbb29e41ef2b..b1fb3cd7cf52 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ TEST_GEN_FILES += transhuge-stress
> TEST_GEN_FILES += userfaultfd
> TEST_GEN_FILES += mlock-random-test
> TEST_GEN_FILES += virtual_address_range
> +TEST_GEN_FILES += va_128TBswitch
This will conflict with a test case for mremap clone functionality
which might have been queued in Shuah's tree.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10031943/
>
> TEST_PROGS := run_vmtests
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests
> index 07548a1fa901..d8305fb83125 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/run_vmtests
> @@ -176,4 +176,15 @@ else
> echo "[PASS]"
> fi
>
> +echo "-----------------------------"
> +echo "running virtual address 128TB switch test"
> +echo "-----------------------------"
> +./va_128TBswitch
> +if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
> + echo "[FAIL]"
> + exitcode=1
> +else
> + echo "[PASS]"
> +fi
> +
> exit $exitcode
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/va_128TBswitch.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/va_128TBswitch.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..2fdb84ab94b1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/va_128TBswitch.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,297 @@
> +/*
> + *
> + * Authors: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> + * Authors: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> + * under the terms of version 2.1 of the GNU Lesser General Public License
> + * as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful, but
> + * WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <sys/mman.h>
> +#include <string.h>
> +
> +#define ARRAY_SIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr) / sizeof((arr)[0]))
> +
> +#ifdef __powerpc64__
> +#define PAGE_SIZE (64 << 10)
> +/*
> + * This will work with 16M and 2M hugepage size
> + */
> +#define HUGETLB_SIZE (16 << 20)
> +#else
> +#define PAGE_SIZE (4 << 10)
> +#define HUGETLB_SIZE (2 << 20)
> +#endif
> +
> +/*
> + * >= 128TB is the hint addr value we used to select
> + * large address space.
> + */
> +#define ADDR_SWITCH_HINT (1UL << 47)
> +#define LOW_ADDR ((void *) (1UL << 30))
> +#define HIGH_ADDR ((void *) (1UL << 48))
Is there any particular reason for choosing 1GB as low and 256TB
as high address ?
> +
> +struct testcase {
> + void *addr;
> + unsigned long size;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + const char *msg;
> + unsigned int low_addr_required:1;
> + unsigned int keep_mapped:1;
> +};
> +
> +static struct testcase testcases[] = {
> + {
> + /*
> + * If stack is moved, we could possibly allocate
> + * this at the requested address.
> + */
> + .addr = ((void *)(ADDR_SWITCH_HINT - PAGE_SIZE)),
> + .size = PAGE_SIZE,
> + .flags = MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> + .msg = "mmap(ADDR_SWITCH_HINT - PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE)",
> + .low_addr_required = 1,
> + },
> + {
> + /*
> + * We should never allocate at the requested address or above it
> + * The len cross the 128TB boundary. Without MAP_FIXED
> + * we will always search in the lower address space.
> + */
> + .addr = ((void *)(ADDR_SWITCH_HINT - PAGE_SIZE)),
> + .size = 2 * PAGE_SIZE,
> + .flags = MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> + .msg = "mmap(ADDR_SWITCH_HINT - PAGE_SIZE, (2 * PAGE_SIZE))",
> + .low_addr_required = 1,
> + },
> + {
> + /*
> + * Exact mapping at 128TB, the area is free we should get that
> + * even without MAP_FIXED.
> + */
> + .addr = ((void *)(ADDR_SWITCH_HINT)),
> + .size = PAGE_SIZE,
> + .flags = MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> + .msg = "mmap(ADDR_SWITCH_HINT, PAGE_SIZE)",
> + .keep_mapped = 1,
> + },
> + {
> + .addr = (void *)(ADDR_SWITCH_HINT),
> + .size = 2 * PAGE_SIZE,
> + .flags = MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_FIXED,
> + .msg = "mmap(ADDR_SWITCH_HINT, 2 * PAGE_SIZE, MAP_FIXED)",
> + },
> + {
> + .addr = NULL,
> + .size = 2 * PAGE_SIZE,
> + .flags = MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> + .msg = "mmap(NULL)",
> + .low_addr_required = 1,
> + },
> + {
> + .addr = LOW_ADDR,
> + .size = 2 * PAGE_SIZE,
> + .flags = MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> + .msg = "mmap(LOW_ADDR)",
> + .low_addr_required = 1,
> + },
> + {
> + .addr = HIGH_ADDR,
> + .size = 2 * PAGE_SIZE,
> + .flags = MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> + .msg = "mmap(HIGH_ADDR)",
> + .keep_mapped = 1,
> + },
> + {
> + .addr = HIGH_ADDR,
> + .size = 2 * PAGE_SIZE,
> + .flags = MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> + .msg = "mmap(HIGH_ADDR) again",
> + .keep_mapped = 1,
> + },
> + {
> + .addr = HIGH_ADDR,
> + .size = 2 * PAGE_SIZE,
> + .flags = MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_FIXED,
> + .msg = "mmap(HIGH_ADDR, MAP_FIXED)",
> + },
> + {
> + .addr = (void *) -1,
> + .size = 2 * PAGE_SIZE,
> + .flags = MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> + .msg = "mmap(-1)",
> + .keep_mapped = 1,
> + },
> + {
> + .addr = (void *) -1,
> + .size = 2 * PAGE_SIZE,
> + .flags = MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> + .msg = "mmap(-1) again",
> + },
> + {
> + .addr = ((void *)(ADDR_SWITCH_HINT - PAGE_SIZE)),
> + .size = PAGE_SIZE,
> + .flags = MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> + .msg = "mmap(ADDR_SWITCH_HINT - PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE)",
> + .low_addr_required = 1,
> + },
> + {
> + .addr = (void *)(ADDR_SWITCH_HINT - PAGE_SIZE),
> + .size = 2 * PAGE_SIZE,
> + .flags = MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> + .msg = "mmap(ADDR_SWITCH_HINT - PAGE_SIZE, 2 * PAGE_SIZE)",
> + .low_addr_required = 1,
> + .keep_mapped = 1,
> + },
> + {
> + .addr = (void *)(ADDR_SWITCH_HINT - PAGE_SIZE / 2),
> + .size = 2 * PAGE_SIZE,
> + .flags = MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> + .msg = "mmap(ADDR_SWITCH_HINT - PAGE_SIZE/2 , 2 * PAGE_SIZE)",
> + .low_addr_required = 1,
> + .keep_mapped = 1,
> + },
> + {
> + .addr = ((void *)(ADDR_SWITCH_HINT)),
> + .size = PAGE_SIZE,
> + .flags = MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> + .msg = "mmap(ADDR_SWITCH_HINT, PAGE_SIZE)",
> + },
> + {
> + .addr = (void *)(ADDR_SWITCH_HINT),
> + .size = 2 * PAGE_SIZE,
> + .flags = MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_FIXED,
> + .msg = "mmap(ADDR_SWITCH_HINT, 2 * PAGE_SIZE, MAP_FIXED)",
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static struct testcase hugetlb_testcases[] = {
> + {
> + .addr = NULL,
> + .size = HUGETLB_SIZE,
> + .flags = MAP_HUGETLB | MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> + .msg = "mmap(NULL, MAP_HUGETLB)",
> + .low_addr_required = 1,
> + },
> + {
> + .addr = LOW_ADDR,
> + .size = HUGETLB_SIZE,
> + .flags = MAP_HUGETLB | MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> + .msg = "mmap(LOW_ADDR, MAP_HUGETLB)",
> + .low_addr_required = 1,
> + },
> + {
> + .addr = HIGH_ADDR,
> + .size = HUGETLB_SIZE,
> + .flags = MAP_HUGETLB | MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> + .msg = "mmap(HIGH_ADDR, MAP_HUGETLB)",
> + .keep_mapped = 1,
> + },
> + {
> + .addr = HIGH_ADDR,
> + .size = HUGETLB_SIZE,
> + .flags = MAP_HUGETLB | MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> + .msg = "mmap(HIGH_ADDR, MAP_HUGETLB) again",
> + .keep_mapped = 1,
> + },
> + {
> + .addr = HIGH_ADDR,
> + .size = HUGETLB_SIZE,
> + .flags = MAP_HUGETLB | MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_FIXED,
> + .msg = "mmap(HIGH_ADDR, MAP_FIXED | MAP_HUGETLB)",
> + },
> + {
> + .addr = (void *) -1,
> + .size = HUGETLB_SIZE,
> + .flags = MAP_HUGETLB | MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> + .msg = "mmap(-1, MAP_HUGETLB)",
> + .keep_mapped = 1,
> + },
> + {
> + .addr = (void *) -1,
> + .size = HUGETLB_SIZE,
> + .flags = MAP_HUGETLB | MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> + .msg = "mmap(-1, MAP_HUGETLB) again",
> + },
> + {
> + .addr = (void *)(ADDR_SWITCH_HINT - PAGE_SIZE),
> + .size = 2 * HUGETLB_SIZE,
> + .flags = MAP_HUGETLB | MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS,
> + .msg = "mmap(ADDR_SWITCH_HINT - PAGE_SIZE, 2*HUGETLB_SIZE, MAP_HUGETLB)",
> + .low_addr_required = 1,
> + .keep_mapped = 1,
> + },
> + {
> + .addr = (void *)(ADDR_SWITCH_HINT),
> + .size = 2 * HUGETLB_SIZE,
> + .flags = MAP_HUGETLB | MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_FIXED,
> + .msg = "mmap(ADDR_SWITCH_HINT , 2*HUGETLB_SIZE, MAP_FIXED | MAP_HUGETLB)",
> + },
> +};
Does the test permutations with 'keep_mapped' form some sort of corner
case for later test cases ? If yes, could you please describe it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists