[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171123144728.GA30139@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 15:47:28 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@....com>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: 4.14: WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 2895 at block/blk-mq.c:1144 with
virtio-blk (also 4.12 stable)
[fullquote deleted]
> What will happen for the CPU hotplug case?
> Wouldn't we route I/O to a disabled CPU with this patch?
Why would we route I/O to a disabled CPU (we generally route
I/O to devices to start with). How would including possible
but not present cpus change anything?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists