[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171123160258.xmw5lxnjfch2dxfw@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 17:02:58 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Andrea Reale <ar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, m.bielski@...tualopensystems.com,
arunks@....qualcomm.com, mark.rutland@....com,
scott.branden@...adcom.com, will.deacon@....com,
qiuxishi@...wei.com, catalin.marinas@....com, realean2@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Memory hotplug support for arm64 - complete
patchset v2
On Thu 23-11-17 11:13:35, Andrea Reale wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi,
>
> this is a second round of patches to introduce memory hotplug and
> hotremove support for arm64. It builds on the work previously published at
> [1] and it implements the feedback received in the first round of reviews.
>
> The patchset applies and has been tested on commit bebc6082da0a ("Linux
> 4.14").
>
> Due to a small regression introduced with commit 8135d8926c08
> ("mm: memory_hotplug: memory hotremove supports thp migration"), you
> will need to appy patch [2] first, until the fix is not upstreamed.
>
> Comments and feedback are gold.
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/4/11/536
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/20/902
I will try to have a look but I do not expect to understand any of arm64
specific changes so I will focus on the generic code but it would help a
_lot_ if the cover letter provided some overview of what has been done
from a higher level POV. What are the arch pieces and what is the
generic code missing. A quick glance over patches suggests that
changelogs for specific patches are modest as well. Could you give us
more information please? Reviewing hundreds lines of code without
context is a pain.
> Changes v1->v2:
> - swapper pgtable updated in place on hot add, avoiding unnecessary copy
> - stop_machine used to updated swapper on hot add, avoiding races
> - introduced check on offlining state before hot remove
> - new memblock flag used to mark partially unused vmemmap pages, avoiding
> the nasty 0xFD hack used in the prev rev (and in x86 hot remove code)
> - proper cleaning sequence for p[um]ds,ptes and related TLB management
> - Removed macros that changed hot remove behavior based on number
> of pgtable levels. Now this is hidden in the pgtable traversal macros.
> - Check on the corner case where P[UM]Ds would have to be split during
> hot remove: now this is forbidden.
> - Minor fixes and refactoring.
>
> Andrea Reale (4):
> mm: memory_hotplug: Remove assumption on memory state before hotremove
> mm: memory_hotplug: memblock to track partially removed vmemmap mem
> mm: memory_hotplug: Add memory hotremove probe device
> mm: memory-hotplug: Add memory hot remove support for arm64
>
> Maciej Bielski (1):
> mm: memory_hotplug: Memory hotplug (add) support for arm64
>
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 15 +
> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 2 +
> arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu.h | 7 +
> arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 116 ++++++++
> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 609 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c | 2 +-
> drivers/base/memory.c | 34 ++-
> include/linux/memblock.h | 12 +
> include/linux/memory_hotplug.h | 9 +-
> mm/memblock.c | 32 +++
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 13 +-
> 11 files changed, 835 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists