[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171123172538.GB32454@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 18:25:39 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>, Scott Wood <swood@...hat.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT] fix IPI balancing for 4.14-rt
On 2017-11-21 10:24:36 [-0500], Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 09:14:25 -0600
> Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > I was testing 4.14-rt1 on a large system (cores == 96) and saw that
> > we were getting into an rt balancing storm, so I tried applying Steven's
> > patch (not upstream yet):
> >
> > sched/rt: Simplify the IPI rt balancing logic
> >
> Why is this patch necessary?
>
> Is it because you have the irq_work running in non hard irq context? I
> think you need something like this instead (if you haven't already
> added it):
I cherry-picked commit 4bdced5c9a29 ("sched/rt: Simplify the IPI based
RT balancing logic") and while refreshing the queue I noticed that the
irq_work struct moved and added the fix below into the original patch
where the IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ flag was added.
> -- Steve
>
> Index: linux-rt.git/kernel/sched/topology.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-rt.git.orig/kernel/sched/topology.c
> +++ linux-rt.git/kernel/sched/topology.c
> @@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ static int init_rootdomain(struct root_d
> rd->rto_cpu = -1;
> raw_spin_lock_init(&rd->rto_lock);
> init_irq_work(&rd->rto_push_work, rto_push_irq_work_func);
> + rd->rto_push_work.flags |= IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ;
> #endif
>
> init_dl_bw(&rd->dl_bw);
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists