[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171123203758.j2tazdpstvhhmpmd@pd.tnic>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 21:37:58 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/18] x86/asm: Remap the TSS into the cpu entry area
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 12:15:14PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> >> index b275863128eb..55858b277cf6 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> >> @@ -98,4 +98,7 @@ void common(void) {
> >> OFFSET(CPU_TSS_SYSENTER_stack, tss_struct, SYSENTER_stack);
> >> /* Size of SYSENTER_stack */
> >> DEFINE(SIZEOF_SYSENTER_stack, sizeof(((struct tss_struct *)0)->SYSENTER_stack));
> >> +
> >> + /* Layout info for cpu_entry_area */
> >> + OFFSET(CPU_ENTRY_AREA_tss, cpu_entry_area, tss);
> >
> > The naming convention of those looks really strange. The beginning is in
> > all caps and then small. Can we choose a convention pls.
>
> This is actually consistent with the rest of the offsets. The
> convention is STRUCT_field.
Except CPU_TSS_SYSENTER_stack. TSS_STRUCT_SYSENTER_stack I guess.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists