| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20171124091448.7649-8-mingo@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 10:14:12 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 07/43] x86/entry: Fix assumptions that the HW TSS is at the beginning of cpu_tss
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
A future patch will move SYSENTER_stack to the beginning of cpu_tss
to help detect overflow. Before this can happen, fix several code
paths that hardcode assumptions about the old layout
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@...e.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/d40a2c5ae4539d64090849a374f3169ec492f4e2.1511497875.git.luto@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 4 ++--
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 8 ++++----
arch/x86/kernel/doublefault.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++-------------------
arch/x86/power/cpu.c | 13 +++++++------
5 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h
index 194ffab00ebe..aab4fe9f49f8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static inline void set_tssldt_descriptor(void *d, unsigned long addr,
#endif
}
-static inline void __set_tss_desc(unsigned cpu, unsigned int entry, void *addr)
+static inline void __set_tss_desc(unsigned cpu, unsigned int entry, struct x86_hw_tss *addr)
{
struct desc_struct *d = get_cpu_gdt_rw(cpu);
tss_desc tss;
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
index 504a3bb4d5f0..c24456429c7d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ enum cpuid_regs_idx {
extern struct cpuinfo_x86 boot_cpu_data;
extern struct cpuinfo_x86 new_cpu_data;
-extern struct tss_struct doublefault_tss;
+extern struct x86_hw_tss doublefault_tss;
extern __u32 cpu_caps_cleared[NCAPINTS];
extern __u32 cpu_caps_set[NCAPINTS];
@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ struct x86_hw_tss {
#define IO_BITMAP_BITS 65536
#define IO_BITMAP_BYTES (IO_BITMAP_BITS/8)
#define IO_BITMAP_LONGS (IO_BITMAP_BYTES/sizeof(long))
-#define IO_BITMAP_OFFSET offsetof(struct tss_struct, io_bitmap)
+#define IO_BITMAP_OFFSET (offsetof(struct tss_struct, io_bitmap) - offsetof(struct tss_struct, x86_tss))
#define INVALID_IO_BITMAP_OFFSET 0x8000
struct tss_struct {
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
index c0fb3eb37ee0..62cdc10a7d94 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -1582,7 +1582,7 @@ void cpu_init(void)
}
}
- t->x86_tss.io_bitmap_base = offsetof(struct tss_struct, io_bitmap);
+ t->x86_tss.io_bitmap_base = IO_BITMAP_OFFSET;
/*
* <= is required because the CPU will access up to
@@ -1601,7 +1601,7 @@ void cpu_init(void)
* Initialize the TSS. Don't bother initializing sp0, as the initial
* task never enters user mode.
*/
- set_tss_desc(cpu, t);
+ set_tss_desc(cpu, &t->x86_tss);
load_TR_desc();
load_mm_ldt(&init_mm);
@@ -1659,12 +1659,12 @@ void cpu_init(void)
* Initialize the TSS. Don't bother initializing sp0, as the initial
* task never enters user mode.
*/
- set_tss_desc(cpu, t);
+ set_tss_desc(cpu, &t->x86_tss);
load_TR_desc();
load_mm_ldt(&init_mm);
- t->x86_tss.io_bitmap_base = offsetof(struct tss_struct, io_bitmap);
+ t->x86_tss.io_bitmap_base = IO_BITMAP_OFFSET;
#ifdef CONFIG_DOUBLEFAULT
/* Set up doublefault TSS pointer in the GDT */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/doublefault.c b/arch/x86/kernel/doublefault.c
index 0e662c55ae90..0b8cedb20d6d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/doublefault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/doublefault.c
@@ -50,25 +50,23 @@ static void doublefault_fn(void)
cpu_relax();
}
-struct tss_struct doublefault_tss __cacheline_aligned = {
- .x86_tss = {
- .sp0 = STACK_START,
- .ss0 = __KERNEL_DS,
- .ldt = 0,
- .io_bitmap_base = INVALID_IO_BITMAP_OFFSET,
-
- .ip = (unsigned long) doublefault_fn,
- /* 0x2 bit is always set */
- .flags = X86_EFLAGS_SF | 0x2,
- .sp = STACK_START,
- .es = __USER_DS,
- .cs = __KERNEL_CS,
- .ss = __KERNEL_DS,
- .ds = __USER_DS,
- .fs = __KERNEL_PERCPU,
-
- .__cr3 = __pa_nodebug(swapper_pg_dir),
- }
+struct x86_hw_tss doublefault_tss __cacheline_aligned = {
+ .sp0 = STACK_START,
+ .ss0 = __KERNEL_DS,
+ .ldt = 0,
+ .io_bitmap_base = INVALID_IO_BITMAP_OFFSET,
+
+ .ip = (unsigned long) doublefault_fn,
+ /* 0x2 bit is always set */
+ .flags = X86_EFLAGS_SF | 0x2,
+ .sp = STACK_START,
+ .es = __USER_DS,
+ .cs = __KERNEL_CS,
+ .ss = __KERNEL_DS,
+ .ds = __USER_DS,
+ .fs = __KERNEL_PERCPU,
+
+ .__cr3 = __pa_nodebug(swapper_pg_dir),
};
/* dummy for do_double_fault() call */
diff --git a/arch/x86/power/cpu.c b/arch/x86/power/cpu.c
index 84fcfde53f8f..50593e138281 100644
--- a/arch/x86/power/cpu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/power/cpu.c
@@ -165,12 +165,13 @@ static void fix_processor_context(void)
struct desc_struct *desc = get_cpu_gdt_rw(cpu);
tss_desc tss;
#endif
- set_tss_desc(cpu, t); /*
- * This just modifies memory; should not be
- * necessary. But... This is necessary, because
- * 386 hardware has concept of busy TSS or some
- * similar stupidity.
- */
+
+ /*
+ * This just modifies memory; should not be necessary. But... This is
+ * necessary, because 386 hardware has concept of busy TSS or some
+ * similar stupidity.
+ */
+ set_tss_desc(cpu, &t->x86_tss);
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
memcpy(&tss, &desc[GDT_ENTRY_TSS], sizeof(tss_desc));
--
2.14.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists