lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 24 Nov 2017 18:18:35 +0100
From:   Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>,
        Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
        Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] s390/virtio: add BSD license to virtio-ccw

On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 07:02:41PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 05:53:01PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > > > Is there any reason to add the whole BSD 3 clause license text? I'd prefer
> > > > if it would be just the simple new SPDX-License-Identifier above.
> 
> I added  it for consistency with other virtio headers.

Well, one of the points of the SPDX tags is to avoid the countless
duplication of license texts. Adding a license text is easy, removing it
again later is not as easy. Therefore I would prefer to avoid the
duplication here again.

Cornelia, Christian, any opinion here?

Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists