lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 24 Nov 2017 21:18:15 +0200
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
Cc:     intel-sgx-kernel-dev@...ts.01.org,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/11] intel_sgx: updated MAINTAINERS

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 01:54:22PM -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 09:45:18PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  MAINTAINERS | 5 +++++
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index 2d3d750b19c0..30a4b7f97a93 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -14932,6 +14932,11 @@ L:	linux-mm@...ck.org
> >  S:	Maintained
> >  F:	mm/zswap.c
> >  
> > +INTEL SGX
> > +M:	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> It is clear from the review thus far that this is going to need
> additional entries here. Likely from the x86 folks at the very least. If
> not maintainers then at least reviewers (R:).

Point taken. I think I can cope with maintaining SGX tree once it is in
the mainline but additional R-entries would make sense. Who do you
suggest? I'm thinking of Dave Hansen at least.

/Jarkko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists