[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1511506294.8230.6.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 22:51:34 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fat: Fix sb_rdonly() change
On Fri, 2017-11-24 at 15:07 +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> writes:
>
> > On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 15:29 +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> > > Ouch forgot to add stable@
> > >
> > > --
> > > commit bc98a42c1f7d0f886c0c1b75a92a004976a46d9f introduced bug.
> >
> > I think your commit message needs a bit more information.
> >
> > It'd be useful to describe that the introduction of
> > sb_rdonly converted the bitwise & to a boolean and so
> > this conversion and comparison was made defective.
> >
> > Are there any other instances of defective comparisons?
>
> Please ask to that patch author.
The patch author, David Howells, is on the cc list.
btw:
It seems all the the other uses use a (bool) cast of the
(*flags & MS_RDONLY) and a comparison of sb_rdonly(sb).
It would make sense to change the argument type of the
ext[24]_setup_super int read_only arg to bool to match
the sb_rdonly() type.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists