linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] Consolidate init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <23236.1511649497@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Sat, 25 Nov 2017 22:38:17 +0000
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Consolidate init_task handling

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> Or at least it's a very unusual use of that word. Why doesn't the
> explanation just say what it does: "move", and say from where to where
> ("from macro to definition" or something)?
> 
> Or "remove macro XYZ, expanding it in place", or something? To me,
> "unroll" has a completely different meaning in computers.

I don't remember why I used the word "Unroll", but "Expand X in place" seems a
good substitute.

Do you want me to repost the patches?

David