[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171125142244.6be06099@archlinux>
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2017 14:22:44 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Philipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@...il.com>,
Rick Altherr <raltherr@...gle.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: adc: aspeed: Deassert reset in probe
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 15:22:38 +1030
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 2:33 AM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 14:49:32 +0000
> > Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com> wrote:
> >> IIO is closed for this cycle anyway now.
> >> Otherwise, series looks good.
> >>
> >> Will pick up when back with my main PC as traveling for this week and
> >> next.
> >
> > Forgot to ask, do you want me to pick this up as a fix?
> > Also does it make sense to tag it for stable?
> >
> > If not I can pick it up for the coming cycle. Given the code changes
> > are small and well isolated I'm happy to do any of the 3 options,
> > it really depends on whether the rest of the platform works well enough
> > to be worth rushing these through?
>
> Without the clock driver upstream there's no rush to merge this. I'm
> still waiting on review from the clock guys.
>
> Please queue them for 4.16. Thanks!
Done - applied to the togreg branch of iio.git which will be pushed
out as testing for the autobuilders to play with it.
Thanks,
Jonathan
>
> Cheers,
>
> Joel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists