[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171126004259.xjl2icw3gbyg3hck@dtor-ws>
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2017 16:42:59 -0800
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Martin Kepplinger <martink@...teo.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] input: pegasus_notetaker: add license information
Hi Martin,
On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 09:45:18AM +0100, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> This adds an SPDX license identifier to this driver I wrote some time back.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger <martink@...teo.de>
> ---
> drivers/input/tablet/pegasus_notetaker.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/tablet/pegasus_notetaker.c b/drivers/input/tablet/pegasus_notetaker.c
> index 47de5a81172f..cdf75c989469 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/tablet/pegasus_notetaker.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/tablet/pegasus_notetaker.c
> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
Should this be GPL-2.0+? The MODULE_LICENSE specifies that the module is
"GPL" which in kernel land means GPLv2+. Or we should change the module
license to strict "GPLv2"?
Also, why do we use C++ -style comments for this?
Greg, do you have any plans on dropping MODULE_LICENSE() altogether and
generating the appropriate string from SPDX markings in the source?
Doing this would prevent mismatches between license notices, SPDX tags
and MODULE_LCENSE() strings, which happen very often.
> /*
> * Pegasus Mobile Notetaker Pen input tablet driver
> *
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists