lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 16:21:09 +0200 From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com> To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com> Cc: flihp <flihp@...bit.us>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>, "Tricca, Philip B" <philip.b.tricca@...el.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, "Roberts, William C" <william.c.roberts@...el.com> Subject: Re: FW: [RFC PATCH] tpm: don't return -EINVAL if TPM command validation fails On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 08:25:29PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > That was my interpretation as well and what I was arguing about. I'm glad to > know that you also think the same. It could be that this rationale has been your earlier emails but I just haven't recognized it :-) I think I'm starting to buy this. I don't have any fixed standing points anything basically. It is just better to be really resistant with anything that is related to user-kernel interaction until you really get it... /Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists