[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171127210411.GS983427@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 13:04:11 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...onical.com>,
Stéphane Graber <stgraber@...ntu.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] cpuset: Enable cpuset controller in default hierarchy
Hello, Waiman.
Sorry about the long delay.
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 05:10:30PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> +Cpuset Interface Files
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +
> + cpuset.cpus
> + A read-write multiple values file which exists on non-root
> + cgroups.
> +
> + It lists the CPUs allowed to be used by tasks within this
> + cgroup. The CPU numbers are comma-separated numbers or
> + ranges. For example:
> +
> + # cat cpuset.cpus
> + 0-4,6,8-10
> +
> + An empty value indicates that the cgroup is using the same
> + setting as the nearest cgroup ancestor with a non-empty
> + "cpuset.cpus" or all the available CPUs if none is found.
> +
> + The value of "cpuset.cpus" stays constant until the next update
> + and won't be affected by any CPU hotplug events.
> +
> + cpuset.effective_cpus
Can we do cpuset.ecpus in the fashion of euid, egid..?
> + cpuset.effective_mems
Ditto.
> + cpuset.flags
> + A read-write multiple values file which exists on non-root
> + cgroups.
> +
> + It lists the flags that are set (with a '+' prefix) and those
> + that are not set (with a '-' prefix). The currently supported
> + flag is:
> +
> + mem_migrate
> + When it is not set, an allocated memory page will
> + stay in whatever node it was allocated independent
> + of changes in "cpuset.mems".
> +
> + When it is set, tasks with memory pages not in
> + "cpuset.mems" will have those pages migrated over to
> + memory nodes specified in "cpuset.mems". Any changes
> + to "cpuset.mems" will cause pages in nodes that are
> + no longer valid to be migrated over to the newly
> + valid nodes.
Let's start just with [e]cpus and [e]mems. The flags interface looks
fine but the implementations of these features are really bad and
cgroup2 doesn't migrate resources for other controllers either anyway.
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists