linux-kernel - Re: 2f47e7e19f ("x86/mm/kaiser: Use PCID feature to make user and .."): WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at mm/early_ioremap.c:114 __early

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hyAt1cPj3jpm9njOZAo02WmN-83ozeyvDF5qipBXqH=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Nov 2017 23:13:43 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        kernel test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, LKP <lkp@...org>,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, wfg@...ux.intel.com,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
        Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: 2f47e7e19f ("x86/mm/kaiser: Use PCID feature to make user and
 .."): WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at mm/early_ioremap.c:114 __early_ioremap

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Dave Hansen
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 11/27/2017 02:18 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> [    0.031000] Call Trace:
>> [    0.031000]  ? kernfs_add_one+0x1d9/0x1f0
>> [    0.031000]  early_memremap+0x33/0x3d
>> [    0.031000]  ? cnb20le_res+0x2f2/0x2f2
>> [    0.031000]  __acpi_map_table+0x1d/0x28
>> [    0.031000]  acpi_os_map_iomem+0x1cf/0x2a0
>> [    0.031000]  ? cnb20le_res+0x2f2/0x2f2
>> [    0.031000]  acpi_os_map_memory+0xd/0x20
>> [    0.031000]  acpi_find_root_pointer+0x1f/0x1ec
>> [    0.031000]  ? cnb20le_res+0x2f2/0x2f2
>> [    0.031000]  acpi_os_get_root_pointer+0x18/0x25
>> [    0.031000]  broadcom_postcore_init+0xc/0x6c
>> [    0.031000]  do_one_initcall+0xc4/0x1f7
>> [    0.031000]  kernel_init_freeable+0x1c2/0x2b2
>> [    0.031000]  ? rest_init+0x1a0/0x1a0
>> [    0.031000]  kernel_init+0xd/0x1bc
>> [    0.031000]  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
>
> I've been able to reproduce this.  The bug here (at least on my system)
> is that we're calling into the ACPI code while 'acpi_disabled=1'.  The
> ACPI code then notices that it hasn't been initialized (because it
> should be off) and calls into the early_ioremap() code thinking that
> it's in early boot.
>
> I don't know why the bisect pinned this on the kaiser patches, or why
> it's only showing up now.  It's possible that some botched TLB flush
> _caused_ ACPI to get disabled at a weird time which then caused this
> warning.
>
> There are some recent changes around broadcom_postcore_init().
>
> ACPI folks, any suggestions on what to do here?  Should we be bailing
> out of acpi_os_get_root_pointer() like the attached patch?

No, the bug is in broadcom_postcore_init(), everything else should be fine.

I'm not even sure why acpi_os_get_root_pointer() is called from there
in the first place.  It should only be called from the ACPICA code.

Thanks,
Rafael