[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <ee9ad214-db0e-002b-0d6e-dfb2142deaf5@de.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 09:15:14 +0100
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] s390/virtio: add BSD license to virtio-ccw
On 11/24/2017 06:18 PM, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 07:02:41PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 05:53:01PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
>>>>> Is there any reason to add the whole BSD 3 clause license text? I'd prefer
>>>>> if it would be just the simple new SPDX-License-Identifier above.
>>
>> I added it for consistency with other virtio headers.
>
> Well, one of the points of the SPDX tags is to avoid the countless
> duplication of license texts. Adding a license text is easy, removing it
> again later is not as easy. Therefore I would prefer to avoid the
> duplication here again.
>
> Cornelia, Christian, any opinion here?
I would prefer to not have the full licence text and only have the SPDX string
if that is allowed by the licence.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists