[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b8a1a898-850c-cc7a-2574-1bfd15cc9888@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 12:27:04 +0100
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VFS: use synchronize_rcu_expedited() in
namespace_unlock()
On 10/26/2017 02:27 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> But just for completeness, one way to make this work across the board
> might be to instead use call_rcu(), with the callback function kicking
> off a workqueue handler to do the rest of the unmount. Of course,
> in saying that, I am ignoring any mutexes that you might be holding
> across this whole thing, and also ignoring any problems that might arise
> when returning to userspace with some portion of the unmount operation
> still pending. (For example, someone unmounting a filesystem and then
> immediately remounting that same filesystem.)
You really need to complete all side effects of deallocating a resource
before returning to user space. Otherwise, it will never be possible to
allocate and deallocate resources in a tight loop because you either get
spurious failures because too many unaccounted deallocations are stuck
somewhere in the system (and the user can't tell that this is due to a
race), or you get an OOM because the user manages to queue up too much
state.
We already have this problem with RLIMIT_NPROC, where waitpid etc.
return before the process is completely gone. On some
kernels/configurations, the resulting race is so wide that parallel make
no longer works reliable because it runs into fork failures.
Thanks,
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists