[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3G4C5Q69ugDHgC2Hy=3xpXt=cviWWnZ6zSV9iWtY+y=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 16:20:53 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Y2038] [PATCH 7/8] [media] staging: atomisp: convert timestamps
to ktime_t
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 14:19 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> timespec overflows in 2038 on 32-bit architectures, and the
>> getnstimeofday() suffers from possible time jumps, so the
>> timestamps here are better done using ktime_get(), which has
>> neither of those problems.
>>
>> In case of ov2680, we don't seem to use the timestamp at
>> all, so I just remove it.
>>
>
>> + ktime_t timedelay = ns_to_ktime(
>> min((u32)abs(dev->number_of_steps) *
>> DELAY_PER_STEP_NS,
>> - (u32)DELAY_MAX_PER_STEP_NS),
>> - };
>> + (u32)DELAY_MAX_PER_STEP_NS));
>
> Since you are touching this, it might make sense to convert to
>
> min_t(u32, ...)
>
> ...and locate lines something like:
>
> ktime_t timeday = ns_to_ktime(min_t(u32,
> param1,
> param2));
>
> From my pov will make readability better.
Yes, good idea. Re-sending the patch now. Thanks for taking a look,
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists