[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5Dtf6mjWt1wg_5NDUNAe4XZ3jvxu0KC2CaUo0wE7gjaRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 14:17:04 -0200
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Otavio Salvador <otavio@...ystems.com.br>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Gary Bisson <gary.bisson@...ndarydevices.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: dts: imx6qdl-nitrogen6x: Add SPI NOR partitions
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Otavio Salvador
<otavio@...ystems.com.br> wrote:
> This adds the partitions definition for the SPI NOR to provide
> backward compatibility with the documented[1] layout used with
> Boundary Devices BSP.
>
> 1. https://boundarydevices.com/boot-flash-access-linux/
>
> It exports to Linux:
>
> mtd0: bootloader
> mtd1: env
> mtd2: splash
>
> Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@...ystems.com.br>
Has this been tested? I mean, have you tested the locking mechanism is
really working in this SPI NOR flash?
As far as I can see the SPI locking mechanism does not need device
tree properties.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists