linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -tip 0/7] tools/perf: Update rbtree implementation and optimize users

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20171127161457.3gqxg2ex67whxtwu@linux-n805>
Date:   Mon, 27 Nov 2017 08:14:57 -0800
From:   Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To:     Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...hat.com, mingo@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 0/7] tools/perf: Update rbtree implementation and
 optimize users

On Sun, 26 Nov 2017, Andi Kleen wrote:

>> Applies on today's -tip tree. Please consider for v4.16.
>
>No numbers on the improvements?

I have not done performance tests perse for perf, but ultimately
it will depend a lot on the workload and size of the tree. I had
previously measured, on a Xeon E5-2450 @ 2.10GHz, the cost of
an rb_first() was ~60 cycles for 100 nodes, and ~75 cycles with
1000 nodes. fwiw.

Thanks,
Davidlohr