[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171127162442.brlncy5wq3kntm45@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 17:24:42 +0100
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/via: use monotonic time for VIA_WAIT_IRQ
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 12:17:03PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The normal DRM vblank interrupt events started using monotonic times in
> commit c61eef726a78 ("drm: add support for monotonic vblank timestamps"),
> which is useful for a number of reasons, including the possible y2038
> overflow.
>
> The VIA_WAIT_IRQ ioctl uses the same drm_wait_vblank_reply as
> DRM_IOCTL_WAIT_VBLANK, but still uses wall-clock time.
>
> This converts it to using monotonic time as well, which is more
> consistent, and avoids problems with the y2038 overflow as well
> as synchronization issues when the real time skips.
>
> I could not find the matching user space that calls the VIA_WAIT_IRQ
> ioctl to verify that this is safe, but it very likely is. Please
> either test or review the user space side before applying this.
You need to check out _seriously_ old versions of mesa and X (plus it's
drivers). Git ftw.
The only caller I've found (in the Xv implementation of the via/openchrome
ddx) doesn't even care about the timestamp. I'm mildly tempted to just
report 0 always, but via isn't worth that much bother really.
Applied, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_irq.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_irq.c
> index 24e71578af4d..c96830ccc0ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_irq.c
> @@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ void via_driver_irq_uninstall(struct drm_device *dev)
> int via_wait_irq(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file_priv)
> {
> drm_via_irqwait_t *irqwait = data;
> - struct timeval now;
> + struct timespec64 now;
> int ret = 0;
> drm_via_private_t *dev_priv = (drm_via_private_t *) dev->dev_private;
> drm_via_irq_t *cur_irq = dev_priv->via_irqs;
> @@ -377,9 +377,9 @@ int via_wait_irq(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file_priv)
>
> ret = via_driver_irq_wait(dev, irqwait->request.irq, force_sequence,
> &irqwait->request.sequence);
> - do_gettimeofday(&now);
> + ktime_get_ts64(&now);
> irqwait->reply.tval_sec = now.tv_sec;
> - irqwait->reply.tval_usec = now.tv_usec;
> + irqwait->reply.tval_usec = now.tv_nsec / NSEC_PER_USEC;
>
> return ret;
> }
> --
> 2.9.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists