[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1511804568.32426.56.camel@perches.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 09:42:48 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] checkpatch: Add a warning for log messages that
don't end in a new line
On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 10:35 -0700, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On 27/11/17 10:28 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > It doesn't miss any mark. It simply informs.
> > Correctness when fixing are a different world of problems.
>
> So how come the double standard?
No double stardard. One correctly informs that a bare
printk is not acceptable.
> Having a missing new line warning
> simply informs here too.
No it has a high false positive rate and newbies
act on that by submitting bad patches.'
Powered by blists - more mailing lists