[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1a6f92f5-2c12-1276-916b-fd2848899e5c@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 13:18:36 -0500
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Yang Shi <yang.s@...baba-inc.com>, tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] lib: debugobjects: touch watchdog to avoid
softlockup when !CONFIG_PREEMPT
On 11/27/2017 12:54 PM, Yang Shi wrote:
> Hi Waiman,
>
> The second patch of this series.
>
> Thanks,
> Yang
>
>
> On 11/17/17 11:43 AM, Yang Shi wrote:
>> There are nested loops on debug objects free path, sometimes it may take
>> over hundred thousands of loops, then cause soft lockup with
>> !CONFIG_PREEMPT
>> occasionally, like below:
>>
>> ...
>>
>> The code path might be called in either atomic or non-atomic context,
>> so touching softlockup watchdog instead of calling cond_resched() which
>> might fall asleep. However, it is unnecessary to touch the watchdog
>> every loop, so just touch the watchdog at every 10000 (best estimate)
>> loops.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.s@...baba-inc.com>
I do have some concern about suppressing the soft lockup warning
entirely. If the system feels unresponsive for a certain period of time
(e.g. 22s), most users would like to know what is going on. It can be a
custom message with less scary warning. Alternatively, some opt-out
mechanism can be added to explicitly disable soft lookup warning for
debugobjs is OK as long as it is not the default.
Cheers,
Longman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists