lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 27 Nov 2017 19:32:18 +0100
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Mikael Pettersson <mikpelinux@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: disable `vm.max_map_count' sysctl limit

On Mon 27-11-17 09:25:16, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org> writes:
> >
> > Could you be more explicit about _why_ we need to remove this tunable?
> > I am not saying I disagree, the removal simplifies the code but I do not
> > really see any justification here.
> 
> It's an arbitrary scaling limit on the how many mappings the process
> has. The more memory you have the bigger a problem it is. We've
> ran into this problem too on larger systems.

Why cannot you increase the limit?

> The reason the limit was there originally because it allows a DoS
> attack against the kernel by filling all unswappable memory up with VMAs.

We can reduce the effect by accounting vmas to memory cgroups.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ