[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20171128131331.GA12924@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:13:31 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jeremy Lacomis <j.lacomis@...il.com>
Cc: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
Teddy Wang <teddy.wang@...iconmotion.com>,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: sm750b: Fix coding style issues in
sm750_accel.c
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 05:48:11PM -0500, Jeremy Lacomis wrote:
> This is a patch to sm750_accel.c that fixes 80-character line length
> warnings found by checkpatch.pl. It also fixes some grammatical errors
> in comments and moves parameter-specific comments from inline to before
> the function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Lacomis <j.lacomis@...il.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Change function comments to the kernel-doc format
>
> drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750_accel.c | 189 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 103 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750_accel.c b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750_accel.c
> index 1035e91e7cd3..42cd920111bf 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750_accel.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750_accel.c
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
Why did you change this line? That is not correct.
Only ever do one "logical" thing per patch. If you have to say "also"
in a changelog text, that's a huge hint you are doing something wrong.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists